Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shaggy Snodgrass's avatar

It used to be that a subculture had to build up a certain attraction "lore" around itself, translated in ever-more elaborate pieces through the eyes of photographers and freelance writers and student filmmakers, before Commerce would look up from its newspaper and see what pieces it could turn into quarterly profits. That took time, usually 3-5 years.

These days, Commerce is much more invasive; it doesn't wait for a culture to grow before it snatches the sapling from the ground and chews it for juice; then casts the husk aside when its few drops are exhausted. The attempts by commercial brands to "steer" an ersatz aesthetic or culture into wide acceptance without that natural accrual of lore are exhausting from the jump; one can almost feel the pitch-deck presentation behind them, and their febrile insistence upon themselves has a de-sensitizing effect upon the targeted "audience".

That's kind of why the mainstream feels so flat; so many conflicting, half-baked "signals" so loud that the sum total is nearly impenetrable "noise".

Even the realest signals can no longer get through, bc you never can know what's organic and what's designed.

Expand full comment
Laurent François's avatar

It's such an interesting piece; Amartya Sen used to say about London that "cultures cross like ships in the nights". I think this argument is even more true with social networks; what seems to fade is actually very much alive somewhere, but not in your feed.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts